__________________________________________________________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ S P E C T R O P O P __________ __________ __________ __________________________________________________________ Volume #0210 January 14, 1998 __________________________________________________________ Unbreakable Long Playing Monophonic Microgroove RecordingSubject: Re: Dave Clark stereo mixes Received: 01/14/99 7:26 am From: Brad Elliott, surXXXXXXXXnline.net To: Spectropop List, spectrXXXXXXXXties.com Greg wrote: >> On one of the last DC5 comps that Epic released, I >> think it was called "The Dave Clark Five," there are some >> beautiful stereo mixes. Then, Paul commented: >Most of the >DC5 stuff came out in reprocessed mono on Epic because Dave >didn't do stereo mixes. In the 70's EMI issued a stereo album of >the stuff which I have. There was an article in Billboard where >the engineer that did the remixes criticized them. The album that Greg refers to is indeed called simply THE DAVE CLARK FIVE, and it indeed is full of beautiful stereo mixes -- 20 of them, in fact the entire contents of the double album. The album was released in 1971, so it may very well contain the same stereo mixes as EMI issued (I'm presuming that was in England). But the fact is that some of the DC5 stuff on Epic was NOT reprocessed mono! The album, with a gatefold cover, is Epic EG 30434. I've got a promo copy that I found years ago. I never thought this was rare, but I've never compared notes with a Dave Clark Five collector, so I really don't know (although, come to think about I, I don't guess I've ever seen another copy). The lineup (all in stereo) is as follows: Side 1: Glad All Over Can't You See That She's Mine I Need Love Good Love Is Hard to Find Try Too Hard Side 2: Because 'Til the Right One Comes Along Whenever You're Around Remember It's Me When I'm Alone Side 3: Having a Wild Week-end Sitting Here Baby Concentration Baby Please Tell Me Why Inside and Out Side 4: Come Home I'll Be Your My Love Forever and a Day Bernedette Hurting Inside These are not simple two-track recordings, but rather multi-track recordings mixed to stereo. A few of the earlier things probably are mixed from three- or four-track, but some of the later stuff had to have been done on eight-track tape, with doubled lead vocals and orchestral backings. If these are the remixes that were criticized by the engineer, then he's NUTS! This stuff would make a great CD! Paul, is this the same stuff on that EMI album? Surf's up! Brad --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Subject: Re: Stereo mixes Received: 01/14/99 7:26 am From: Stewart Mason, flamXXXXXXXXcom To: Spectropop List, spectrXXXXXXXXties.com Paul Urbahns wrote: >You'll just have to live with the monos. The difference between >Dave Clark and the Beatles producer, George Martin, was George >tried to rewrite history by saying the Beatles albums were not >issued in stereo in the past, which they were. The DC5 stuff was >rechanneled and not in true stereo in the 60s, so in this respect >Clark should not be compared to George Martin. I'll have to look this up to be absolutely sure, but I'm 99% positive that what George Martin actually said was that with Beatles records up to (and including?) the white album, the mono mix was the one which he and the engineers spent the most time and care on, with the stereo mixes done quickly and almost as an afterthought. It reflects poorly on my credentials as a 60s pop fan, but I have to admit that the stereo-vs-mono debate usually means little to me. The primary benefit of CDs like Our Alec's exemplary ODESSEY AND ORACLE reissue, where the album is presented in stereo and then in mono, is that I can listen to the album twice in a row without having to get up. Having said that, I did find the stereo mix of PET SOUNDS on last year's box set endlessly fascinating, simply because it was a chance to hear and isolate certain instruments in the arrangements, and to detect sounds I'd barely registered before. I did the same thing as a teenager in the mid-80s with a quadrophonic copy of DARK SIDE OF THE MOON I bought from Paradox Mail Order in Torrance, CA. The mix was just different enough to be oddly intriguing. Are there any other notably interesting stereo/mono mix differences? Stewart --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Subject: Dave Clark Received: 01/14/99 7:26 am From: Paul Urbahns, PaulurXXXXXXXXom To: Spectropop List, spectrXXXXXXXXties.com Billy G. wrote: > Until some time in 1967, all of the DC-5's recordings had been > mixed in mono only. It's probably the usual reasons why they > were done this way; mono was more popular in England during the > mid 60's, teenagers bought more mono records than stereo, > records were mixed for AM radio, etc. I think the mono mixes are > great. According to an interview I saw with Dave Clark in some documentary he referred to the Dave Clark 5 as having a "commerical sound" he knew what he wanted a loud commerical sound. I guess if he had worked in stereo from the beginning it would have cost twice as much to fill two channels as one. David Bash wrote: > A few years ago he led people to believe that he would lease The > Dave Clark Five's proper albums and got several of his fans' hopes > up. David, The DC5 two disk set did not set the world on fire like the beatles reissues did. Therefore, I bet he's having trouble finding anybody interested. A few DC5 songs have shown up on movie CDs but the original albums (as I undertand it) were quite lame. I'd like to see a CD or rare or previously unissued stuff from him. I heard he was going to cut hang On Sloopy but the McCoys issued there version, is his still in the can? But honestly only a handful of collectors would buy something like that. Paul Urbahns paulurXXXXXXXXom --------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------- Subject: Moore info Received: 01/14/99 7:26 am From: Jamie LePage, le_pageXXXXXXXXties.com To: Spectropop List, spectrXXXXXXXXties.com Richard Globman wrote: >The group that tours around the southeast is called "Bill >Pinkney and the Original Drifters". Your post mentions Clyde >McPhatter and Johnny Moore as the chief honchos... > >Where does Bill Pinkney fit in here? When I learned Johnny Moore had passed away, and that he sang on several Drifters sides, I realized I needed a refresher course in Drifters history. Clyde McPhatter, Ahmet Ertegun, Jerry Wexler, Bacharach/David, Ben E. King, Leiber & Stoller...all familiar names, but Johnny Moore? Well, I wanted to learn more and started doing some digging around in various books, articles and notes. In doing so, I compiled my findings into the Johnny Moore post hoping our New York R&B aficionado listers would chime in (hint, hint). A short passage from Charlie Gillett's book Making Tracks, page 93: QUOTE Ahmet Ertegun: "One of my favorite groups at the time was the Dominoes. I used to go and see them at the Apollo.... One day I went to Birdland, and Clyde wasn't there. I liked his high voice, and the way he sang, so I went backstage and said to Billy (Ward), 'Where's Clyde?' And he said 'Oh, we fired him'.... "(I) had dinner (with Clyde) the next day, and signed him up. "...he had another group of friends who were really good, gospel singers called the Thrasher Wonders, one of them could sound just like the bass of the Dominoes...." The new formation, baritone **Bill Pinkney** and the brothers Andrew and Gerhart Thrasher, completed the lineup of Clyde McPhatter and the Drifters. END QUOTE So, yes, Pinkney was in the original McPhatter line up. This first incarnation of the Drifters, under the direction of Ahmet Ertegun and Jerry Wexler, had the 1953 hit Money Honey and a great personal favorite, the 1954 hit Honey Love. After a stint in the service, McPhatter was persuaded to go solo. As I mentioned in my earlier post, George Treadwell owned the rights to the name "Drifters." So McPhatter's leaving eventually led to Treadwell bringing in the Ben King line up to record as the Drifters, and it is that line up that we so strongly associate with Leiber and Stoller, even though in fact Ben King cut less than a dozen sides as the Drifters lead. Scott Bauman wrote: >>'Under The Boardwalk' reportedly features Phil Spector on >>guitar. . . . >I know that Phil played guitar on "On Broadway." Did he also >play guitar on "Under the Boardwalk"? Again from Making Tracks, page 167: QUOTE Mike Stoller: "We signed (Phil) up to write and produce for us, gave him some advances, and Jerry Leiber let him stay at his house for a while. Phil started writing, with Jerry and some other people, and Jerry took him to a lot of sessions, employed him on quite a few as guitarist." UNQUOTE While it is acknowledged that Phil played the guitar on "On Broadway," there is ample evidence that he also played on a number of other Leiber/Stoller records from this time. From the book "The Phil Spector Story" by Rob Finnis, page 31: QUOTE Leiber and Stoller began using Phil as a session guitarist cum-factotum. They were heavily involved with Atlantic at the time and Spector played session-guitar with the Coasters ("Shopping For Clothes", Thumbing a Ride") La Vern Baker ("Saved" b/w "Don Juan") and the Drifters ("Sweets For My Sweet"). UNQUOTE Finnis goes on to say that Spector, surprisingly, did NOT play guitar at the Stand By Me session (during which they also cut three Phil co-writes), but according to Finnis, Phil did play on King's "Ecstasy" and "Yes" cut a year later. As to Under The Boardwalk, I picked up that info from one of the wire service obits on Johnny Moore (thus my use of the word "reportedly"). Does anyone have a fairly reliable list of Leiber/ Stoller dates on which Spector was employed as guitarist? I am (finally) off to get the much touted Drifters box set this weekend... -- All the best, Jamie LePage
Spectropop text contents © Spectropop unless
stated otherwise.
All rights in and to the contents of these documents, including each element embodied therein, is subject to copyright
protection under international copyright law. Any use, reuse, reproduction and/or adaptation without written permission of the owners is a violation of copyright law and is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.