
[Prev by Date]
[Next by Date]
[Index]
[Search]
Spectropop - Digest Number 1251
- From: Spectropop Group
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004
________________________________________________________________________
SPECTROPOP - Spectacular! Retro! Pop!
________________________________________________________________________
There are 17 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. the stereo/mono debate
From: Paul Bryant
2. Attn all Lloyd Thaxton fans
From: Patricia
3. Re: Mark Radice
From: JJ
4. Re: Attn all Lloyd Thaxton fans
From: Mikey
5. Re: Vinyl Junkies
From: Art Longmire
6. Re: Many great men
From: Peter Kearns
7. Re: the stereo/mono debate
From: John
8. Re: Jeff Lynne
From: Peter Kearns
9. The New Order ( the 60's guys!)
From: Mike
10. Re: Many great men
From: Steveo
11. Re: Al Kooper
From: Stephanie
12. Re: THE Al Kooper?
From: Scott Charbonneau
13. Re: Mark Radice
From: Mike
14. Re: Al Kooper
From: steveo
15. Re: All our celebrity guests
From: David Coyle
16. Fountains & Ivy; Free; Free; Shep & The Heartbeats and Limelites; pressings
From: Country Paul
17. Re: Rubber Ball
From: Steveo
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Bryant
Subject: the stereo/mono debate
John Sellards wrote:
> True, and I sometimes appreciate the ability to hear
> individual parts as well in a stereo mix. But stereo
> mixes don't often have the knockout punch that mono
> versions do
I sit hear listening to a bunch of girl group stuff in
stereo for the first time, so this is very close to
what Buddhists call Enlightenment, but the point is
that SOME of the stuff, like You Don't Own Me or
Chapel of Love, or The Boy from Noo York City, are
transformed, and some, like It's In His Kiss, are
strangely diminished. The stereo often sounds like the
aural equivalent of one of those "exploded diagrams"
of car engines, and it's fascinating to see all Betty
Everett's bits and pieces laid out for me to enjoy,
but with the brass off to the side it just hasn't got
the oomph that the mono does.
So you have to judge song by song. Some are better,
some not. With Pet Sounds, as the accompanying book
says, it's not done to replace the mono. It's another
version. Like, say, the director's cut of Apocalypse
Now is another version, not intended to replace the
first famous version.
pb
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:07:25 -0000
From: Patricia
Subject: Attn all Lloyd Thaxton fans
Concerning those who have inquired about a DVD -- or (hint hint)
DVDs, wouldn't a BOX SET be groovy??? -- below is a direct
quote from the man himself rec'd just today:
"I have all the material and am seriously considering it.
If I could get more mail like yours, it would HAPPEN!"
C'monnnnnnnnn everybody, LET THE BOMBARDMENT BEGIN!!! :)
Rock on,
Patricia
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:20:25 -0000
From: JJ
Subject: Re: Mark Radice
Mike McKay:
> I have a Mark Radice album that I believe dates from the
> mid-70s. On the cover, he looks to be all of about 12 years
> old. Haven't listened to it in years, but I recall thinking
> it was pretty good. And though I'm not the kind of label-
> squinter that many Spectropoppers are...
Al Kooper:
> I had a wonderful Mark Radice single on DECCA called "Natural
> Morning". A pop beauty amazingly overlooked. Any of you 'poppers
> heard it or own it ?
**Yes, a great track, but Mark Radice's PIECE DE RESISTANCE is,
"Three Cheers (for the sadman"), another, circa '68, Decca 45
.......with lots of Brian Wilson "tricks" init!
While having Mr Al Kooper on line, I must say that I really
LOVE his first 45, fr 1965, "New York's my home (Razz-A-Ma-Tazz)
.....could use an orig copy, anyone?
Another Al Kooper related question; US group DON MEEHAN PROJECT
did a FAB cover of "A house in the country" (Columbia circa late
68? 45), off B,S &T. first album, and I wonder if AK are aware
of this cover + if he's heard it?
JJ/Sweden
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:51:13 -0500
From: Mikey
Subject: Re: Attn all Lloyd Thaxton fans
Please Mr Thaxton.....put out your shows on DVD!!!! ALL of
them!!!!!
Mikey
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:58:56 -0000
From: Art Longmire
Subject: Re: Vinyl Junkies
Mark Frumento wrote:
> Alan Haber who lurks here recommended Brett Milano's book
> "Vinyl Junkies". Only three chapters in and already I've
> found the book to be hysterical and right on the money with
> regard to vinyl collecting - in fact collecting in general.
> Highly recommended.
> Here's a link to the Amazon listing: http://tinyurl.com/2x4t5
I've skimmed over parts of the book, Mark -- it's intriguing,
although I don't agree with everything he says. One statement
made in the text really caught my eye -- someone was quoted as
saying that there are no female record collectors! There's got
to be some somewhere, although I personally don't know any ...
Art Longmire
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:29:17 -0000
From: Peter Kearns
Subject: Re: Many great men
Country Paul wrote:
> I disagree with the Great Man Theory. There were many great men (and women).
> All contributed something, some more than others. All mentioned above
> certainly were leaders. There are also more. I think comparisons past a
> certain point are occasionally entertaining, but more often useless
> exercises in frustration.
I wholeheartedly agree, and probably never more than that moment
right after I've spoken and hit the send button. I always think of an
alternative to something I said, thus the pointlessness of opinion
(mainly mine) in general.
So who's better than who is indeed a wild goose chase; maybe it's
more a matter of defining period. Personally I would stretch the
whole inspirational period to last until around-about 1980 -- then it
closes in on itself. There are however, many pleasing remnants if you
hunt them out.
Being from New Zealand, I've been forced to work within many styles
over the years and there was even ten years where I didn't give the
60s a thought. But I came full circle to realize that nothing has
ever really been improved upon since. Which surely is one reason why
we are all here.
Peter.
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:52:29 -0000
From: John
Subject: Re: the stereo/mono debate
Paul Bryant wrote:
> So you have to judge song by song. Some are better,
> some not. With Pet Sounds, as the accompanying book
> says, it's not done to replace the mono. It's another
> version. Like, say, the director's cut of Apocalypse
> Now is another version, not intended to replace the
> first famous version.
I couldn't agree more. In some way I've always felt lucky
that there are "other" mixes to be found of familiar things.
John
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:50:35 -0000
From: Peter Kearns
Subject: Re: Jeff Lynne
Martin Jensen wrote:
> I really agree with you in this. Have you heard the Zoom album,
> which [Jeff Lynne] issued in 2001 (or was it 2002, ...nevermind)
> under the old Electric Light Orchestra name? There's a song on
> it called 'State of Mind', which faboulously evokes a 60s feel.
> It's quite a good album... Both Ringo and George plays on it.
Yes, I've got "Zoom." I really like it, but personally I thought it
might as well have just been another Jeff Lynne album, if somewhat
inferior to his "Armchair Theatre." The only other ELO contribution
is Richard Tandy on one track.
But who cares? I'm biased and love everything Jeff does.
Richard Hattersley wrote:
> I think Jeff is a great producer and I love that drum sound
> too, it's so fat. I really don't understand why he gets such
> a hammering by press and music buffs.
> Maybe you have to have been around in the 70s to hate ELO,
> but being born in '74 I only vaguely remember ELO at their
> height of fame, hence I hear the sounds of Jeff Lynne without
> any image and I like it.
Again, it's the same rubbish where ELO were concerned. They got a
hammering in certain quarters too just because combining pop and
classical was considered corny maybe. The songs and arrangements
were brilliant and originally inspired by Jeff and Roy Wood's
devotion to the psychedelic 60s.
I hear virtually everything Jeff does as a continuation of ELO in a
way and I'd recommend listening to ELO's 'A New World Record' from
1976, if you haven't already. It's all there -- the spawn of the 60s,
plus the seeds for an arm of pop production that flourished in the
80s/90s.
Mark Frumento wrote:
> I for one am glad to read posts in defense of Jeff Lynne.
> He may not technically be a great producer but he's like
> one of us getting a shot at producing (I mean us fans, not
> the rest you who were/are producers
Not technically great? How on earth did you come to this
conclusion?
All you have to do is read down today's top 40, and you'll
get a clear picture of the producers that are getting a 'shot',
and have very little in the way of musical expertise.
Peter.
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:36:27 -0000
From: Mike
Subject: The New Order ( the 60's guys!)
For some time, I've been trying to contact and unearth information on
the NYC based discotheque beat combo, the New Order. Three singles
were released on Warner Brothers in 1966, with the first two being
stellar garagey-pop beat masterpieces: "You've Got Me High" and "Why
Can't I". No wonder the first single never made it to the bigger AM
radio market playlists, with a title like that!
Members included vocalist Roger Joyce, who is still singing
somewhere, form what I understand, Billy Barberis, and Bobby
Weinstein (himself famous for scribing scores of pop hits). I also
believe one or two of the New Order guys were doubling as session
players, having played on the Don Kirshner/Jeff Barry produced in NYC
band backing tracks for Monkees tunes.
So, anyone out there recall these guys, and/or can put me in touch
with the elusive Mr. Weinstein or anyone else? And I dig their Pucci
outfitted attire -- stylin!
Thanks in advance!
Mike
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Steveo
Subject: Re: Many great men
Country Paul:
> And re: Chuck Berry, before him rock & roll guitar
> had not been formulated. He seriously affected all
> players after him (with the possible exception of
> Duane Eddy and Chet Atkins, who "wrote their own
> books") - including, if we remember, early Beach
> Boys and Beatles records, which liberally copped
> his style, albeit with much different guitar tones.
Paul Bryant:
> And Buddy Holly, and the Rolling Stones. That's
> quite a bagful.
Mr.Bryant,
There's no one like Chuck Berry for influence...
that's for sure. Chuck says he was influenced by
Muddy Waters....well, I think the whole rock scene was
influenced by Chuck!
Steveo
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:41:13 -0000
From: Stephanie
Subject: Re: Al Kooper
I cant believe this legend has posted here!!!! Man this is a
shock. I would like to let Al know I loved his book "Backstage
Passes," which came out some years ago, and also to let him
know he is one of America's best kept musical secrets. The
improvisation on "Like A Rolling Stone" is dynamic...
Stephanie
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:55:25 -0000
From: Scott Charbonneau
Subject: Re: THE Al Kooper?
Indeed!!! GREAT to see Al here. Hopefully he will be a frequent
contributor to Spectropop. If any of you have yet to read his
autobio "Backstage Passes and Backstabbing Bastards" by all means
pick it up immediately!!! Al is a great storyteller with a terrific
sense of humor. Whenever I pick this book up and read a few pages
I cannot help but start laughing.
Al, a question for ya. I recall, quite a few years back, you were a
frequent contributor to Goldmine. I always enjoyed your reviews when
they appeared. But then, no sooner you were featured in their pages,
you just as quickly disappeared. What happened? I do recall a letter
or two complaining about your writing style, specifically the use of
certain off-color terminology. Was this a factor?
Finally, the Blues Project: Awesome band!!!!!
Scott
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:25:00 -0000
From: Mike
Subject: Re: Mark Radice
Mark Radice wrote:
> I'm 46 now, still writing about 3 songs a week, and have
> been fortunate enough to have my songs on well over 120
> different CDs :) I passed the 3000 mark for songwriting
> in 1998....sick, ain't it?
Hey Mark,
We corresponded privately last summer...recall my webpage
with all of your pre teen 45s and pic sleeves? How long
did it take you to pen your dancefloor fave, "10,000 Year
Old Blues"? And I hope there are more tasty pop tunes
from your '67-'69 era to be enjoyed!
Mike
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:37:17 -0800 (PST)
From: steveo
Subject: Re: Al Kooper
Mikey wrote:
> For Al Kooper:
> Al, could you tell us the story about how you came to write
> "This Diamond Ring" and how Gary Lewis came to record it?
Al,
would be interested to know if you were involved with
the Lewis session, and who chose to have the "Chordovox"
sound on the organ. Was John West involved?
Steveo
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:48:27 -0800 (PST)
From: David Coyle
Subject: Re: All our celebrity guests
Wow, I've been away too long and it's only been a week
or so.
I really don't have any minutiae-related questions for
Ron Dante, Lloyd Thaxton, Al Kooper, Austin Roberts,
Artie Butler, or any of our other "celebrity" guests
on the list. I sincerely hope none of them regret
coming out of the shadows to share their stories with
us.
But I guess I will throw out a few random comments.
I'll try like the rest of you not to be a nuisance to
these guys, but I'm sure I will have more comments and
questions as time goes on:
Al Kooper: It's interesting to see you on the list, as
I just recently picked up a copy of "For The Love Of
Harry: Everybody Sings Nilsson" which you produced a
few years ago. There are some great performances on
it, not the least of which is "This Could Be The
Night" as done by Brian Wilson. How did you end up
doing "Salmon Falls" with Klaus Voormann? It's
interesting to see how a guy goes from being a Beatles
fan in a club in Hamburg to such a well-known session
man. Of course you had to have started as someone's
fan in a club yourself. I also have the 2-CD Blues
Project CD, which is packed full of great stuff. Love
your keyboard work on "No Time Like The Right Time."
Lloyd Thaxton: I heard about you mostly in connection
with the Knickerbockers. Your name is all over the
2-CD "Knickerbockerism" set on Sundazed, which of
course you also wrote an introduction for. I picked up
your LP "Lloyd Thaxton Presents Land Of 1,000 Dances,"
which features Round Robin, your own Chubby Checker,
it seems. Was disappointed there was no Knickerbockers
involvement...or was there? Yours is one of the many
great TV rock shows I would like to have seen or would
love to see on tape. Glad to see you on the list...you
certainly write like a TV show host.
Austin Roberts: Can you clear something up for me? Did
you sing the lead vocal of the original "Scooby-Doo"
theme song, or just do some of the session backing on
the other music for the show? I seem to have missed
something after you showed up on the list. If that WAS
you, I can only say I love that song...very
Beatlesque. None of the followup "Scooby" themes
compare...don't get me started on Scrappy-Doo.
Artie Butler: You wrote "Down Home Girl," then? That's
probably my favorite track from "The Rolling Stones,
Now." Was it written in any sort of conscious
imitation of "Hitch Hike" by Marvin Gaye? Even if it
was, it doesn't detract from the song in the least.
"Every time I kiss you, it tastes like pork and
beans...and that perfume that you're wearing was made
from turnip greens," or however the line goes, is
fantastic.
Ron Dante: Love "Sugar Sugar," love "Tracy." That's
about all I can say. That "Sugar Sugar" video you did
for VH-1(?) is a hoot.
By the way, saw discussion about the Rock Flowers.
Just to give everyone an idea of just how old I am,
"Number Wonderful" actually reached its chart peak the
day after I was born... (a fact I found out from the
excellent "Bubblegum Is The Naked Truth" book)
Thanks for deciding not to lurk on the list, guys.
David
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:19:53 -0500
From: Country Paul
Subject: Fountains & Ivy; Free; Free; Shep & The Heartbeats and Limelites; pressings
Peter Kearns:
> 'Fountains Of Wayne'? You've GOTta be kidding!!?? Those two examples
> owe Brian a debt
I respectfully disagree with your opinion on FoW, Peter. Ignore "Stacey's
Mom" -- it was too cute to start with. The rest of the album has some very
high points, as does the previous one, "Utopia Parkway." And their offshoot
band, Ivy, is talking to the heart of Spectropop on many of their tracks,
especially the gorgeous "Edge of the Ocean" on the "Long Distance" CD. And
Ruby, I don't hear Brian Wilson in Wilco, either.
Hurdygurl:
> Now, here's my toss on Brian Wilson's influence: How about Todd
> Rundgren? His very melodic songs, his great harmonies, his
> arrangements, with separate "movements". I don't know if Todd has
> ever acknowledged a debt to Brian, but I feel Brian's stamp on Todd's
> writing. Anyone else see this?
Yes, indeed.
Clark Besch:
> Even cooler in 1970 was [Free's] "B" side, "Mouthful of Grass".
> A very cool mellow instrumental, that using the CSG system,
> stretched the ending bass note for about 10 seconds! Really
> cool technique.
... and a beautiful record. It got me hoping that THAT was what the band was
really about. (It wasn't.)
Paul Balser, re: answer songs, mentions "Daddy's Home" by Shep & The
Limelites. It was actually an answer song to one of the granddaddies of
group harmony, the Heartbeats' "A Thousand Miles Away" (same lead singer --
James Sheppard), which contains the verse:
You're a thousand miles away
But I still have your love to remember you by
Oh my darlin' don't you cry
Daddy's coming home soon
... and the bridge:
It may be on a Monday
It may be a Tuesday afternoon
But no matter what the day is
I'm gonna make it my business to get home soon
Note the lyric parallels to "Daddy's Home."
Mark "cleve":
> The [Left Banke] album with "Queen of Paradise" is entitled
> "Strangers on a Train", and it came out on the Relix label.
> I think I played it once, and probably should play it again!
Didn't the Grateful Dead own that label? And is it still in business?
Clark again:
> Ok, was this the pressing or just bad mastering? "Sally Go Round the
> Roses" by the Jaynetts.
Two answers: (1) Tuff was pressed and distributed by Chess, notorious for
using cheap but rugged vinyl, much like Cameo Parkway. They'd start bad, and
then stay that way. (2) "Sally" has some conscious tinkering with the
overall volume levels. Might that be bad mastering, or just creating dynamic
differences where none exist?
And add another "family" of labels to the cheap styrene club -- the indie
distribution alliance Circa, which was active in the early 60's. Sadly, one
of their more major labels was Indigo, home of one of my fave groups, the
Innocents, with or without Kathy Young. There's cue burn on every one of
their records I ever played on the air.
Onward
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:49:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Steveo
Subject: Re: Rubber Ball
Bob Celli wrote:
> I'm fairly certain that Tommy Allsup was the contractor for
> those sessions, Sid Sharp would get the strings together and
> Johnny Mann would get the singers he wanted. I assumed that
> Johnny Mann was directing the choir for the session from in
> front but BV told me that he was right in the middle of the
> group singing. I have copies of some of Ernie's charts for
> Devil Or Angel and Rubber Ball. He originally had written
> the "bouncy bouncy" part on Rubber Ball for both "boys and
> girls"; that's the way he marked the sheet! I guess they
> tossed the "boys" out after the first couple of takes!
Bob,
That's a cool story that Ernie eliminated the male
singers from "Rubber Ball". Guess he felt that it was
too corny having the guys sing "bouncy bouncy" as well.
(Turned out to be a wise decision) Lol
The chart on "Devil or Angel" is a pop masterpiece!
Steveo
-------------------[ archived by Spectropop ]-------------------
SPECTROPOP - Spectacular! Retro! Pop!
End
Spectropop text contents © copyright 2002 Spectropop unless
stated otherwise.
All rights in and to the contents of these documents, including each element embodied therein, is subject to copyright
protection under international copyright law. Any use, reuse, reproduction and/or adaptation without written permission of the owners is a violation of copyright law and is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.